<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can I send confidential emails by Gmail? You can in New York.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://compujurist.com/2009/02/24/307/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://compujurist.com/2009/02/24/307/</link>
	<description>Practice Management, Legal Technology and items of interest for the Modern Lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:26:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Toby Brown</title>
		<link>http://compujurist.com/2009/02/24/307/comment-page-1/#comment-24678</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compujurist.com/?p=307#comment-24678</guid>
		<description>Nerino - I posted on this subject recently (www.geeklawblog.com) and agree with you that lawyers should be cautious about how they use email.  My read on Gmail is that it actually doesn&#039;t meet the NY opinion.  Specifically I don&#039;t think Google&#039;s &quot;policies and stated practices protect client confidentiality.&quot;  Google&#039;s TOS gives them a right to any content that touches their systems.  Thus not only are they not protecting client information, they are excersizing a right to own it in a sense.

Thanks for the timely post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nerino &#8211; I posted on this subject recently (www.geeklawblog.com) and agree with you that lawyers should be cautious about how they use email.  My read on Gmail is that it actually doesn&#8217;t meet the NY opinion.  Specifically I don&#8217;t think Google&#8217;s &#8220;policies and stated practices protect client confidentiality.&#8221;  Google&#8217;s TOS gives them a right to any content that touches their systems.  Thus not only are they not protecting client information, they are excersizing a right to own it in a sense.</p>
<p>Thanks for the timely post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
