<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nerino Petro&#039;s Compujurist.com &#187; E-Discovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://compujurist.com/category/e-discovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://compujurist.com</link>
	<description>Practice Management, Legal Technology and items of interest for the Modern Lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:17:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Read &#8216;Avoiding ethical pitfalls with electronic documents&#8217; co-authored with Bryan Sims</title>
		<link>http://compujurist.com/2010/07/19/read-avoiding-ethical-pitfalls-with-electronic-documents-co-authored-with-bryan-sims/</link>
		<comments>http://compujurist.com/2010/07/19/read-avoiding-ethical-pitfalls-with-electronic-documents-co-authored-with-bryan-sims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nerino Petro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Legal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redaction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compujurist.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State Bar of Wisconsin has published a two part article I co-authored with  Bryan Sims of The Connected Lawyer in the July editions of its InsideTrack e-newsletter. Titled  'Avoiding ethical pitfalls with electronic documents' , part 1 is on Metadata and part 2 is on Redaction.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compujurist.com/2010/07/19/read-avoiding-ethical-pitfalls-with-electronic-documents-co-authored-with-bryan-sims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Example of When a Judge WILL Order a Computer Forensics Exam</title>
		<link>http://compujurist.com/2010/06/16/one-example-of-when-a-judge-will-order-a-computer-forensics-exam/</link>
		<comments>http://compujurist.com/2010/06/16/one-example-of-when-a-judge-will-order-a-computer-forensics-exam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nerino Petro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compujurist.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post over at Bow Tie Law's Blog on one example of when a judge wasn't hesitant to allow forensic examination of a party's computer. Needless to say, the conduct of one of the one of the party's most likely made this decision much easier for the judge (Note to party- don't lie to a federal judge).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compujurist.com/2010/06/16/one-example-of-when-a-judge-will-order-a-computer-forensics-exam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let them eat Cake in Computer Forensics? Maybe not this time.</title>
		<link>http://compujurist.com/2009/12/16/let-them-eat-cake-in-computer-forensics-maybe-not-this-time/</link>
		<comments>http://compujurist.com/2009/12/16/let-them-eat-cake-in-computer-forensics-maybe-not-this-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nerino Petro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compujurist.com/?p=626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law enforcement agencies around the country use Encase from Guidance Software to forensically image computer disks in investigations and prosecutions. This means that defense experts need to own this $3,000+ program rather than a less expensive alternative. However, in Washington State it appears that is no longer the case.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compujurist.com/2009/12/16/let-them-eat-cake-in-computer-forensics-maybe-not-this-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Secret Service and its Best Practices for Seizing Electronic Evidence</title>
		<link>http://compujurist.com/2008/07/07/us-secret-service-and-its-best-practices-for-seizing-electronic-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://compujurist.com/2008/07/07/us-secret-service-and-its-best-practices-for-seizing-electronic-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nerino Petro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hmmm!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compujurist.com/2008/07/07/us-secret-service-and-its-best-practices-for-seizing-electronic-evidence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think of this as your handy cheat sheet for grabbing electronic evidence when you donâ€™t have a data evidence expert handy. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compujurist.com/2008/07/07/us-secret-service-and-its-best-practices-for-seizing-electronic-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-Discovery gaff waives Attorney-Client Privilege</title>
		<link>http://compujurist.com/2008/06/09/e-discovery-gaff-waives-attorney-client-privilege/</link>
		<comments>http://compujurist.com/2008/06/09/e-discovery-gaff-waives-attorney-client-privilege/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nerino Petro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compujurist.com/2008/06/09/e-discovery-gaff-waives-attorney-client-privilege/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems a number of factors were at work in this case including poorly defined keywords for the search as well as a failure to properly review documents that were not electronically searchable.  The end result was that 165 privileged documents were turned over to the Plaintiff by Creative. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compujurist.com/2008/06/09/e-discovery-gaff-waives-attorney-client-privilege/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

