Adobe Acrobat 8: Is there a Reason to Upgrade?

Adobe has announced the pending release of Acrobat 8, but the question remains is it worth the upgrade?  There's long been a debate whether Acrobat standard was sufficient or if attorneys needed to use the professional version; however, it appears this debate may be over as the new features that will interest lawyers the most will only be available in the professional edition.

Adobe details the upgrades for legal professionals on its website here.  According to Adobe, the features that relate to the legal profession include:

    * Permanently remove sensitive information (redaction)

    * Metadata removal

    * Built-in support for Bates numbering

    * Enable forms saving in Adobe Reader 8 and auto-recognize form fields

    * New, intuitive user interface

    * Combine multiple files into one PDF package

    * True batch printing

    * Support for PDF/A archiving standard

    * Archive Lotus Notes e-mail

    * Manage shared reviews

    * Faster Adobe PDF creation and rendering

    * Improved OCR engine

These improvements will not be available in the standard edition apparently.  Adobe does provide a side-by-side comparison chart of the Acrobat family of products here.

While Adobe Acrobat 8 is not yet shipping, the Adobe website shows that you can pre-order with upgrade pricing for Acrobat 8 Professional set at $159.00. The bottom line is that this is a good price to upgrade to Professional with features such as Bates numbering that you previously had to purchase from a third party: I think that it will be worth the price to upgrade.


Posted under Legal Software, Software by Nerino Petro on Tuesday 26 September 2006 at 8:13 am

LexisNexis Buys CaseSoft, ABA TechShow and other musings.

It’s been pretty hectic the last month and I’ve been remiss in posting. April found me in Chicago for the Practice Management Advisors Meeting immediately followed by the ABA TechShow  and associated events including:  LexThink Lounge, lunch with the makers of Amicus Attorney, dinner with Corel WordPerfect representatives and the 7th Annual Consultants and Technologists Dinner.  Some terrific sessions at TechShow this year and it was nice being an attendee without any speaker or other duties. The vendors’ area was sold out and actually expanded; the majority of the vendors were there offering EDD services and it will be interesting to see who is still standing when the dust settles a year or two from now. Amicus Attorney demonstrated their new Version 7 for the PMA’s. Its use of SmartTags and .net integration is truly impressive. While I’ve always been less then impressed by its “pretty” interface, I have to admit that what I saw made me reconsider the product 9 as well as its new time, billing and accounting program).  I’ve also been impressed by the improvements and stamina of WordPerfect in the latest version X3 (this is really a unique way to call it version 13 without being blatant about it).

 

As usual, TechShow and its associated events was a great opportunity to see old friends and make new ones. Some of the folks I got a chance to spend some time with included:

 

Kevin Thompson

Ernie Svenson

Matt Homann

Jim Calloway

Dan Pinnington

Dan Coolidge

Bruce Dorner

Reid Trautz

Craig Ball

Ross Kodner

Dennis Kennedy

Mark Deal

Tom Mighell

And my fellow PMA’s of course!

 

 

The following week I was speaking at the Civil Trial Counsel of Wisconsin annual conference at Kohler, Wisconsin. April also witnessed the rollout of my program’s  Practice411 listserv in Wisconsin which now stands at over 350 members and growing. Then it was preparation for the State Bar of Wisconsin’s Annual Convention in Madison and the official debut of the Law Office Management Assistance Program. From Madison, I was off to St. Louis the following week for a meeting of the ISBA Committee on Legal Technology and attending its Legal Boot camp seminar on MS Word and Excel for Legal Professionals. I’m now in Toronto for PCLaw www.pclaw.com  training and ready to head back to the States to spend time in the office and catch up on work. However, I came across an interesting bit of news on Tuesday May 16 while in Toronto – LexisNexis has acquired CaseSoft the maker of CaseMap, TimeMap, NoteMap and the rest of the CaseSoft family of products. You read that correctly,  another successful legal software company has been snatched up by one of the legal industry behemoths.

 

CaseMap has taken the legal industry by storm the last few years based on the quality of its products, their ease of use and integration with other products. It hasn’t hurt that the product itself continues to improve and provides a number of useful features including its integral Adobe PDF Creation, ReportBook function and links to TimeMap and other programs. It’s easy to see why many consider this to be the premier cases analysis tool. 

 

Consolidation seems to be the current trend in the legal software industry with Thomson West and Reed Elsevier buying companies and products that they believe enhance their offerings to attorneys. So far, I think that the LexisNexis acquisitions including HotDocs, TimeMatters and PCLaw have proven to be better moves as these products appeal to a far wider user base than ProLaw and Elite. I understand the need for capital to continue funding new product development and can appreciate the owners of these products getting a chance to enjoy the fruits of their labor. However, a person does have to wonder if this is good for the industry to lose competition. In many ways this is becoming similar to the soft drink wars between Coke and Pepsi. As these companies continue to grow and absorb smaller companies, do we lose our choices and will they end up being opposite sides of the same coin?

Posted under Blogging, Hmmm!, Legal Software by Nerino Petro on Wednesday 17 May 2006 at 7:46 pm

Take Your Dictation Digital

For many attorneys, dictating into a tape recorder is a fact of life. For many, myself included, who are keyboard challenged, dictation is usually much faster for document production then trying to type it myself. Like the gunslingers of the Old West who kept their trusty Colt Peacemaker by their side, no attorney is without his or her handy recorder. It might be a Dictaphone, maybe an Olympus or another brand. Some attorneys still used desktop dictation units. However, like an endangered species, tape based dictation units and handheld units that have a 4 in 1 slide switch (no push buttons allowed) are getting harder to find. I had a terrific Olympus unit that I used for many years: it was small, had terrific battery life and was probably the best handheld unit that I had owned in 14 years. Alas, it finally died one day and it turned out that Olympus had stopped making this model. Other units were available but were larger, not as user friendly, and lacked quality in their construction.

I also have to admit that replacing tapes, dealing with jams and my secretary not understanding what I said because a section of tape was bad could get frustrating. Finding a transcription unit for her also became an issue. When my Olympus died, I decided to switch to digital dictation based on demonstrations I saw of products at an annual ABA TechShow. One product was free, but you had to buy the foot pedal unit from them. There were some bugs, but the company was very good at working with me to get everything functioning. The drawback of this system, was that for dictation, it relied on a headset to your computer with on-screen controls for recording, rewind, fast forward, etc. This proved to be very cumbersome. I had also seen at TechShow handheld microphones from Phillips that seemed to make more sense.

In addition to my legal practice, I have a technology consulting company. Before I’ll recommend a product I have to try it and be satisfied that it’s a reliable, trouble free item that will work for my clients. In searching for another digital transcription system, I came across a product called QuikScribe , which was an Australian product marketed in the US. Unlike some solutions, QuikScribe uses a proprietary file format called IAF (Intelligent Audio Format). One thing I found to be a very nice feature of the IAF file format was the ability to embed text and images inside the dictation. Now, when I was dictating a brief I could copy portions of the cases I downloaded from Westlaw right into the dictation. When my secretary reaches this point in the file, she can past this text directly into the document she is typing. I no longer have to dictate each quote. Likewise, if I want to reuse a contract or other provision, I can copy it and place it directly in the dictation file – no more marking up a photocopy or trying to tell her in the dictation what I wanted copied. You can also embed graphics into the dictation and create training session that include the images and the audio. Unlike tape, each dictation is its own file and we can I can modify them by insertion or overwriting in the file. If I need one file finished before another, she can go directly to the file without having to hunt through a tape to try and find it. Coupled with a Phillips SpeechMike , I could dictate at my desk and send them to the dictation server software and place different priorities and requested completion times on each file. Additionally, I can have a notification when the file is completed. I no longer have to worry about worn out tapes, problems with the recorder or transcription unit since everything is computer based. My secretary has a foot pedal just like here old transcription unit. This product passed the actual use test in my own office and I now recommend it. But something was still missing, still keeping me from being 100% happy with the change:: I had no way of dictating when I was away from my office unless I used my notebook computer and wired hand dictation unit.

QuikScribe will import the industry standard DSS file format as well as others. Olympus, Panasonic and Sony all make digital handheld recorders which use the DSS file format. I first bought an Olympus unit, but it didn’t have 4 in 1 slide switch and it soon found it’s way to my discarded gadget drawer. Some time went by and I saw a digital recorder with a 4 in 1 slide switch at another TechShow. The downside was that it was over $300.00; surely there was a less expensive alternative. I then bought a Sony unit that was around $100.00. Same problems as the Olympus: although the button placement was better, it just wasn’t as convenient for dictation and inserting a change or overwriting only a portion of a dictation segment was laborious. I recently bought a Phillips 9350 hand recorder that has a 4 in 1 slide switch, and dictation satisfaction rating is now 100%.

About the size of my old Olympus tape unit, the Phillips works in very much the same way. Moving from a tape based unit to the Phillips takes very little effort and it’s difference rapidly become second nature. Since there is no tape, to separate each dictation segment, you simply push an EOL (End of Letter) button. With replaceable memory cards, you can vary the amount of recording time the unit holds which is helpful if you’re going to be out of the office for some time. The dictation files can be emailed to your office or downloaded to your desktop system. When I download files, my QuikScribe program is configured to automatically import any files that are added to a specific folder and I can then use QuikScribe to make changes or to send them to my secretary. I can also email them to her and she can bring them into her QuikScribe player program. The unit also comes with a basic program for playback and Phillips also makes a foot pedal and transcription software package which is adequate for many offices if the office doesn’t believe that they need the IAF format (although I think the benefits of IAF make it worth the slightly greater cost). Olympus also makes a very popular unit the DS4000 which is similar to the Phillips unit.

Both the Phillips and Olympus units connect to a computer via USB. The docking station is optional with the Phillips 9350 and the 9350 is less expensive than the DS4000. The cradles of both units act as docking stations to download files and to charge the rechargeable batteries (the batteries come with the Phillips docking unit). You will also not find these units at your local Office Depot or Staples stores. Generally, you are going to have to find an authorized local dealer or on-line reseller. Another local attorney has a DS4000 and has nothing but praise for it and how its made his life so much better. I have no problem recommending either of these units.

So, if you’re tired of fighting old tapes, listening to your staff complain about not understanding what you said, make the move – go digital.

Posted under Hardware, Legal Software, Mobile Tech, Software by Nerino Petro on Wednesday 17 August 2005 at 8:29 pm

« Previous Page